They told me I had freedoms then locked me away when I exercised those freedoms.

USA Gymnastics doctor to plead guilty to child porn charges!

When you read the above article you become very aware of how tainted our world has become.

It is tainted not because the man spent the last 20 years allegedly chasing after young girls on a University Campus and making them feel assaulted and abused as the paper suggests and he pleaded to.

It is tainted because after all he went through to clean his life up and still gets caught, shows you just how far the legal system is willing to go to prove a man or woman is a danger to society for the individual choices.

They are burning down the streets over Planned Parenthood rights,

They are burning down the streets over Freedoms of Speech,

They are arresting and dragging men to court for alleged charges and forcing people to plead guilty to “heinous crimes,” with no further proof aside from, “hearsay.”

The formal plea agreement has not been filed in federal court, and no plea hearing has been scheduled. His next scheduled appearance is for August.

Matt Newburg, one of Nassar’s attorneys, declined to comment.

Do you know what is next for that man, because his lawyer declined to defend his client?

Can someone please inform me as to why any corporation anywhere needs, 80,566 beds in a span of 74 facilities. Are there really that many crimes to be committed? Are there really that many Americans committing crimes, or are there that many projectable incomes from the sustaining power of governmental spending?

Are they really using the internet to promote what is deemed legal in the state of California and out west to inadvertently incarcerate and imprison grown able body men for no other reason than for being able bodied men?

I tell you they do the same to women?

Not for crimes that would make anyone cringe but for the things we do privately in our own homes, The very things that they said they were separating from the State Bar. They wanted freedom from religion yet imprison a man or woman for prostitution. In a secular community, prostitution is fine is it not?

Homosexuality is fine is it not? Yet the bible already gave you the law and many in the courts have placed themselves above the rule of law of the bible and show no grace; Instead the make millions off of Plea Bargons!

Because of this man’s “heinous crime,” he will be fed 4 ounces of food. He will be asked to find a job in the worst part of town where everyone is on welfare and where they do not hire, “sex offenders.” They will call it gainful employment, which does not correlate as, “working for family businesses.” He will be expected to work at McDonalds or a Gas station after having been a University professor. Who by the way went to college so that he would never have to work in a field, like a slave!

He will be told in his search for work, he is never to have more than $60.00 on his person until he completes parole. Which some men have been in this facility for the past 10 years if not longer, trying to figure out how to make a living when you are denied everything marketable.

He will be told never to touch a computer again to seek work because he can not be trusted, mind you in an advanced world,  Our lively hoods have been placed upon this Tech given to us by Bill Gates and the like, and I ask you as a concerned citizen; Where is this logic in this mass screening of US citizens?

Where is all of this heading?

I keep being told that no one knows what is going on.

No one knows how they treat people who have been locked up and seek Redemption, yet as I read the paper, these lawyers keep folding to the mass genocide of America!

So I am going to take the time to inform you.

Piece by piece you will come to understand how much money is being gained by corporations like this and how not a single American will benefit from it.

Now, I a law abiding citizen will tell you, Not to commit crimes and you won’t have to worry about giving money this kind of corporation. Only I have found that Cyber security is too free in hearsay charges for me to trust that anyone is committing the said crimes they are accused of.  If someone can tell me how a man or woman communicating with a student of legal age; Clearly you have to be of legal age to attend a University, legal age being that above 18, is liable for a sexual assault case based upon communication?

Tell me the man actually touched the girls, not that he sent them a texted communication or took pictures of them because if I work for a magazine and decide to take a picture of beautiful women to show for a Cosmopolitan ad about what I perceive to be beautiful and I am considered a, “Nasty person,” for taking pictures I am going to scream that I do not live in Russia, so get off my back!

The plea deal includes an agreement that Nassar will register as a sex offender and an agreement that the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Michigan will not prosecute him for alleged sexual exploitation or attempted sexual exploitation of children, including an incident in 2015 in his swimming pool.

(You want to know why?)

Cause they never had a case!

If you can not get me for the whole crime then don’t touch my door step at all!


4 thoughts on “They told me I had freedoms then locked me away when I exercised those freedoms.”

  1. Yes it appears that our judicial system is inconsistent and contradictory. i believe that God built us with inherent knowledge of what is right and what is wrong. We all know when we’ve done something wrong!

    My mother always taught me if ever in doubt, don’t do it!

    One last thing…freedom of expression does not give us freedom of consequence.

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this.

    Mike Jay

    1. Freedom of expression does not give us a freedom of consequence??

      Is that supposed to be some catchy way of justifying excessive abuse  of authority, or the inherent need our judicial system has of making a profit off the backs of its denizens. When I was a child they used to say, “if you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime.”

      Only that is not the issue here, The man had an out, his lawyers choked, and are feeding and propagating a problem that is solved not by filling prisons but by remaining objective. Not labeling.

      Are you telling me there is a consequence for taking pictures of women and putting them in magazines because if that is the case why don’t they just file on hugh hefner, and his ilk. As long as the narrative remains as it is, mark my words, there will be some illicit back story written up about the producers of American television from the 90’s to present and all of them will have to  serve time or settle out of court due to the lack of Freedom of expression or the freedom of consequence and the here say a good negative story can produce.

      It is apparent we don’t all know what is right and what is wrong and just because people do not always act responsibly or have a mental defect does not give the government the right to threaten or police an entire industry. This is in reference to ATF, which may become the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Computers.

      Which includes your mobile device.

      And please don’t give me that line, about how you don’t do anything anyway, because they are not going after people that are doing something. They are going after people that are allegedly doing something and scaring them into pleas.

      It is a breach into privacy, which I suppose you are in line to believe that is not a right either, huh?

      That would make you no friend of mine.

  2. It was obvious to me that the author is very passionate about the role of the judicial system in punishing alleged perpetrators. The fact that plea bargains can occur without any charges or any trial appears to be unfair in the author’s eyes.

    I can appreciate the fervent response the author made regarding a particular incident, but the tone of the page made it seem like an old-time preacher standing on a rock delivering fire and brimstone to all within earshot.

    Whether the alleged actions of an individual could result in a debatably appropriate punishment without trial may be beside the point. Wouldn’t it be more to the point to offer the evidence, the result, and more detailed reasoning as to why the result is unfair?

    Taking that tact, I believe your message would reach a larger audience which, of course, is why we blog.

    1. The author would love to offer evidence. 

      Except the evidence according to the press, and all those involved, is leading; one sided, and the man pled guilty! What evidence can be offered when the accused, convicted him or herself. No matter what evidence you bring up after the fact, The cry of the victim, the denial of the perpetrator, the back and forth of the “here-say” crowd; Everything is silenced when a person says, “I plead guilty!”

      Making it a win-win for the state penal system, a close and shut pocket exchange of money for the defense attorney’s and judge  that do not care one iota that the man may have been innocent had he refused to incriminate himself and subside to 115 accusations that had no proof besides, “here-say.”

      What proof did the prosecutors have, “Confiscation of a man’s trash,” Which if they did get a court order to go through the man’s trash, we won’t here about it. They went through the man’s computer files and found he was convictable based upon what he viewed in his own private time. This was the same manner used to  convict Jared the Subway MAN, and everyone thought that was ok?

      Sorry, I have a thing against police states~ and you should too!

      If that is preaching, then I shall preach.

      This has been your Advent Voice!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *